Context graphs are gaining spotlight momentum as one of the most consequential structural ideas in enterprise AI - especially as enterprises grapple with how to get agentic to work beyond pilot environments.

Enterprise environments run on distributed systems, evolving data, and layered governance requirements. Decisions routinely span multiple platforms and timeframes, while the information that governs those decisions often lives in isolated systems, policies, or documentation.

As AI systems retrieve data, reason across domains, and act within operational systems, each step introduces conditions that determine whether a decision is valid. Where data originated, how it was transformed, which relationships it depends on, and what constraints govern its use all shape whether an action should proceed.

Context provides a way to make these conditions explicit and durable. By modeling relationships,, and usage constraints directly, context graphs keep decisions connected to the circumstances that justified them, even as execution spans systems and time. This allows decisions to be evaluated consistently wherever they are acted upon.

This creates an enabling layer for enterprise AI Context and decision traceability that can inform not just what happened but why it was allowed.

At Indykite, we’re excited for this change in the conversation and the market's attention on context graphs. This is the foundation we have been building from day one - although we take it one step further: combining context, decision precedents with embedded data trust to inform use and enforcement at runtime.

The architectural challenge for AI

Present day enterprise data architectures were not designed to support agentic AI. Data is fragmented across systems of record, operational platforms, and domain-specific pipelines, each optimized for a specific application or team. Access patterns, data models, and governance controls are defined locally within those systems, rather than across decisions that span domains.

As a result, data access is tightly coupled to predefined pipelines and interfaces. Data is prepared in advance for known use cases, often aggregated, filtered, or transformed to fit a specific reporting or application need. When data is accessed outside these paths, context such as provenance, sensitivity, or usage constraints is frequently lost or must be reconstructed manually.

These architectures also assume that decisions happen at well-defined points. Governance is applied upstream through schema design, permissions, and classifications, or downstream through audit and review. This works when data use is predictable and human-driven.

Agentic AI introduces a different operating model. Data is accessed dynamically based on the situation at hand, combined across domains in ways that cannot be fully anticipated, and used to inform actions as conditions change. Decisions are not confined to a single system or moment. They unfold across time and execution paths.

In this setting, system-centric architectures struggle to maintain coherence. Governing conditions are enforced inconsistently across the ecosystem and decision context fragments as execution moves. Without a shared mechanism to evaluate conditions of use at runtime, continuous decision-making becomes incredibly difficult to govern.

This architectural mismatch is a primary constraint on enterprise adoption of agentic AI. Without a way to carry context and governing conditions across systems and decisions, autonomy remains limited to controlled environments rather than operational reality.

Enabling agentic AI with context graphs

Bridging this gap requires a different architectural approach. Enterprise data must be organized into a shared structure that links entities, events, and attributes across systems, rather than remaining isolated within individual data sources and applications. Graphs provide this connective structure, making relationships and context explicit and available to be leveraged for decisions and retrievals.

‍

This is a crucial distinction between context graphs and graphs used primarily for insight or observability. With context graphs, context shifts from being descriptive to being enforceable. When systems retrieve data autonomously and carry decisions into execution, context determines whether an action is appropriate under the conditions present at that moment. Each data interaction becomes a governed decision, captured and available to inform subsequent decisions.

‍

Over time, this creates a continuous decision layer across the enterprise. As decisions are made, the conditions, constraints, and outcomes associated with them are preserved. When similar decisions occur, systems can evaluate them in light of this history, supporting more consistent behavior across applications and time.  Capturing these within the same structure that connects data allows AI systems to reason not only over current conditions, but over how similar situations have been handled before. This continuity is what allows agentic behavior to remain consistent, traceable, and governable as execution spans systems and time.

From context graphs to trusted outcomes

This level of governance and control is novel when it comes to enterprise systems and is absolutely critical for AI enablement. Context graphs are a clear answer to the missing layer question and provide the underlying architectural foundation that enterprise AI requires. Without this agentic AI will be limited to narrow, artificial boundaries that cannot meet the demand or expectation of AI.

At IndyKite, we deliver this enabling layer but also go further – combining context, decision precedents with embedded data trust to inform use and enforcement at runtime.

This additional level of trust ensures you greater transparency and accountability for agentic output and higher decision accuracy.

Additionally, it’s ready and deployed in major enterprises around the world while all the other vendors are trying to get their shoes on.

Learn more: https://www.indykite.ai/indykite-ai